Urevo SpaceWalk 3S vs WalkingPad R2 2-in-1
Quick verdict
Winner on Gym Score: WalkingPad R2 2-in-1 (100)
Urevo SpaceWalk 3S still wins for some buyers — see the fit cards below.
Best for
- · WFH workers wanting a sub-$300 walking pad
- · First-time walking pad buyers testing the habit
- · Apartments where a 4-inch profile slides under most desks
$279Buy on Amazon
Best for
- · Hybrid users who want walking and occasional jogging in one unit
- · Apartments with strict floor-space limits (folds vertical)
- · Buyers who already trust the WalkingPad ecosystem after a P1
$499Buy on Amazon
Spec-by-spec
| Spec | Urevo SpaceWalk 3S | WalkingPad R2 2-in-1 |
|---|---|---|
| Motor | 2.25 HP | 2.5 HP |
| Belt Size | 46" x 17" | 47" x 16" |
| Thickness | 4.2" | 5.5" |
| Max Speed | 4 mph | 4.97 mph |
Urevo SpaceWalk 3S
Strengths
- +Under $300
- +2.25 HP motor
- +App + remote controls
- +Fits under most desks
Weaknesses
- −Tread belt wears faster than WalkingPad
- −Shorter warranty
- −Louder at 3 mph+
WalkingPad R2 2-in-1
Strengths
- +Folding handrail (jog-capable)
- +2.5 HP motor
- +Top speed 4.97 mph
- +Built-in display
Weaknesses
- −Thicker than P1 (5.5")
- −Heavier
- −Pricier at $700+